The Truth About MH370 Could Change the World
If real, leaked videos reveal secret advanced technology (and a massive cover-up)
This article will be refined and expanded as I learn more. Note that it is not intended to be exhaustive—it is a brief summary of the research and the introduction of a theory based on my initial interpretation of key evidence. What follows is largely made possible through the diligent efforts of citizen journalist Ashton Forbes to gather and analyze the data. I encourage anyone interested in this topic to follow him for ongoing updates as we march toward the truth. I also welcome comments, questions, and alternative theories that advance the conversation.
Finally, this article is not meant to be disrespectful to families of the missing and those affected by this event. My goal is to honor them by uncovering the truth so that their ordeal was not in vain. We don’t get answers to questions we don’t ask.
The mystery of missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 has captivated the world for almost a decade. Thanks to renewed interest by committed truth-seekers, we may be close to understanding what really happened to that plane. If what follows is even partly true, we may be on the verge of a disclosure of truly epic proportions. What is revealed through this investigation has the potential to change the world.
Based on a review of the available evidence, it is possible that the disappearance of MH370 was not an accident. The plane did not crash.
From the official safety report, we see ample opportunity for events to take place undetected by the regional air traffic control agencies. But that doesn’t mean no one saw. The leaked videos, if real, prove that US agents were watching as the plane disappeared out of thin air. Then they covered up what they saw.
The potential implications are staggering and profound in what they reveal. They expose the depth of the secrets, lies, and deceit, but also the hope of a brighter future through technology that can change the world. MH370 may be the proof that we are not alone and reality is not as we assumed it to be.
The Official Safety Report
Let's set aside the mesmerizing videos of three spheres circling flight MH370 and focus for a moment on what is revealed in the official Safety Investigation Report prepared by the Malaysian ICAO Annex 13 Safety Investigation Team for MH370 and issued on July 2, 2018. According to the report, we have a plane with no identified mechanical or other performance defects or deficiencies, cargo that has been securely loaded according to safety guidelines, no sign of terrorist activity, and was being flown by reputable pilots and crew with no known mental or physical health issues. This is not a plane that should have an emergency.
Yet, at 17:21 UTC on March 8, 2014 the plane disappeared off air traffic control radar and has never been found.
Reading between the lines of the safety report, we see the potential for a manufactured opportunity to purposefully disappear a plane.
This doesn’t prove that is what happened—only that it could have.
Let's look at what have been stated as the facts, as they relate to creating a state of confusion and uncertainty that leaves us with little data on the missing plane. Between the plane’s disappearance from radar, the unavailability of the satellite communication (SATCOM) link, and operational failures on the part of Air Traffic Control, we have a period of time where the plane is silent and invisible to those responsible for it. Additionally, due to a long delay in activating emergency protocols, for hours no one outside of the affected Air Traffic Control even knows to look for it. While the potential for manipulation of the report findings is high, this analysis takes the following data points as stated.
Radar Monitoring Lost – According to the report, the Mode S symbol of MH370 dropped from radar display at 17:20 UTC, with the last secondary radar position symbol of MH370 recorded at 17:21 UTC. The last Aircraft Communication Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) transmission was made through the aircraft’s SATCOM system at 17:07 UTC. Malaysian military radar allegedly caught blips of the plane as it headed west until 18:22 UTC but took no action as it posed no risk. Interestingly, Ashton reported that radar contact was lost at 18:40 UTC not 18:22 UTC, as stated in the report. This is important because it coincides with the time of the videos discussed below and when the plane allegedly took its southern turn to the South Indian Ocean.
SATCOM Link Down - SATCOM link is down for an estimated 22 to 78 minutes, starting before the plane’s disappearance (last contact at 17:07 UTC) and extending to 18:25 UTC, when an automatic log-on was successfully initiated, albeit with abnormal frequency bursts. The expected reports at 17:37 UTC and 18:07 UTC were not received. The report concludes the most likely explanation is a power interruption. However, the report also concludes major elements of the plane’s electrical system were functional.
Air Traffic Controller Operational Failures - The on-duty Air Traffic Control Officer (ATCO) responsible for tracking MH370 stated that he did not continuously monitor the progress of MH370 because he had to shift his focus to four other flights. He did not notice when the plane dropped from radar.
There was also confusion around the jurisdictional transfer of control. The flight crew of MH370 signed off with the Kuala Lumpur Area Control Centre (KL ACC) at 17:19 UTC, just two minutes before it dropped from radar. This was its last recorded radio transmission. MH370 was instructed to contact the Ho Chi Minh Area Control Centre (HCM ACC). Not having heard from MH370, HCM ACC reached out to KL ACC at 17:39 UTC to inquire about the plane’s location. The on-duty Controller at HCM ACC who was responsible for MH370 that night “could not explain why he did not initiate any call to MH370 within the standard 5 minutes” as specified by protocol. The transfer of control was not marked on the flight progress slips. Nobody seemed to know whose airspace the plane was in. Adding to the confusion were projected instead of actual readings from the Flight Following System.
The emergency actions dictated by standard protocol were not initiated until much later at 22:32 UTC, over 5 hours from disappearance and 4 hours and 5 minutes from when the Distress Phase should have been declared. This provides additional cover for whatever is occurring with the plane. Also curious is that the battery for the emergency underwater locator beacon expired two years before the flight, further limiting available data on the plane’s location.
While it is possible that the Air Traffic Controllers were actors in the disappearance, such a plan does not require inside cooperation. It just needs to create enough confusion and uncertainty to introduce human error and the appearance of incompetence.
The Leaked Videos
The anomalies detailed in the official safety report raise doubt as to whether the disappearance was a tragic accident or something top secret. The leak of two videos taken by a US spy satellite and the US drone MQ-1C Gray Eagle, if real, give us a smoking gun that more is afoot than just a missing passenger plane.
The videos, attributed to 18:40 UTC in the Nicobar Islands, show three spheres circling what is assumed to be the MH370 plane in a precise pattern. We see trails in front of the spheres indicative of advanced gravitational technology. We then have the mind-boggling sight of the plane disappearing in a zap. One moment it is there, the next moment it is gone.
Ashton and other researchers (including myself) are convinced every aspect of the videos are real for several reasons, which are covered more in depth in this companion article. Broadly, they appear to be direct screen recordings by someone (believed to be Lieutenant Commander Edward Lin) logged into the US spy database via Citrix. The operator moves the screen to keep the objects in view, showing an intent to capture and share this incredible event.
Additionally, from previous leaks of satellite video, we know the capability exists for satellite video at the observed resolution. Researchers were able to identify a pair of spy satellites in the right location at the right time with the right payload to take the video. It is satellite pair USA-229.
Working with video experts, Ashton found no evidence of video editing, tampering, or hoax, save for enhancements made by the leaker, presumably within the intelligence software programs used by the government. Specifically, a thermal layer was added to the drone video for a more complete picture of the event, including the critical observation that the zap was cold not hot, indicative of a black hole not an explosion. Data from the spy satellite was used in conjunction with the Space Based Infrared System and Signals Intelligence to create the 3D stereoscopic imagery in the satellite video. Ashton was able to confirm that the side-by-side, parallax imagery is consistent with two cameras looking down, as would be the satellite pair’s configuration. Additionally, Ashton and fellow investigators have been able to refute, with evidence, attempts to debunk the videos.
The videos are also somewhat corroborated by an eyewitness account. As reported by Ashton, witness Kate Tee saw a glowing orange plane with a fuzzy orange halo and what looked like black smoke trailing behind it. Her timeframe (18:40 UTC) and location (near Nicobar Islands) align with the satellite coordinates and time that the satellite was in position to record the footage. Unfortunately, she reportedly went below deck and did not witness the disappearance.
There is other anecdotal evidence that may suggest the plane didn’t crash, such as reports from 19 families that the phones of people on board continued to ring when called for four days after the event. Additionally, the same Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) that heard the Titan sub pop did not register the sound. Nor did the Diego Garcia and Western Australia hydrophones report anything consistent with the impact of a 777 on the water.
What are we to make of this?
We have a passenger plane with no known defects that drops off air traffic control radar, deviates from its intended flight path, and disappears without a trace after being circled by three spherical objects traveling at extremely high speed in a precise rotating pattern. According to the safety report, MH370 never sent a distress signal (though others have disputed this), never attempted an emergency landing despite multiple airports in its flight path, and was never found, save for some miscellaneous (and potentially suspect) debris.
What are we to make of all this? To help answer that, additional information is useful.
The videos tell us that at least one satellite was directed at the plane and the event playing out. Same with the drone, which must have been stationed nearby and had enough notice to be deployed in time to witness the event. It is unclear whether the satellite first detected the object or if the satellite was purposefully pointed in the direction to capture it. Presumably, the drone was dispatched due to foreknowledge of some event taking place at that location or was tracking the plane as it veered off course. Whatever the sequence of discovery, the plane’s location was known and being tracked.
It would follow that the official narrative about MH370 going missing and flying to its demise in the Southern Indian Ocean is a lie. The US was watching it.
While it is mind-bending to see an object vanish in a zap, theoretical physics says it is possible. With what we currently understand about wormholes and the quantum realm, teleportation is a real phenomenon that can be explained. Ashton points to a handful of scientific papers that support this technology. Additionally, whistleblower testimony, such as that provided by David Grusch, has alleged the existence of a secret US reverse engineering program to recreate alien technologies, of which this may be one. Decades of UFO sightings also support the idea that we are being visited by advanced civilizations with technology that far surpasses our current commercial capabilities.
Thus, teleportation technology (or whatever the precise terminology may be) is not so far-fetched as we might think.
It is also curious that 20 employees of what was formerly Freescale Semiconductor (now NXP Semiconductors) were on board MH370 traveling to Beijing. According to ChatGPT, Freescale Semiconductor was an American multinational corporation headquartered in Austin, TX that designed and manufactured embedded systems and semiconductor products. They had a significant presence in China, including research and development activities and business operations.
Having so many employees on one flight is typically prohibited by continuity policies, especially regarding high-value employees. There are a number of leads to follow regarding Freescale and the acquisition by NXP not long after the disappearance, which are covered in this article. Incidentally, the top shareholder of NXP is Fidelity investments, which is run by Abigail Johnson, who is on the board of Bill Gates’ Breakthrough Energy Technologies.
There is likely a clue to the larger motive to be found in who and/or what was on board the plane, what expertise they held, and what companies and countries had interests in them.
The Theories of Why
Even if we accept that MH370 was teleported to a different location, we still don’t know why (or where, though the Diego Garcia American military base is a candidate). Four plausible reasons to deploy this technology are: (1) espionage, (2) rescue, (3) test or operation, and (4) alien intervention. Undoubtedly, there are and will be other theories, but these seem the most central at this point. Of these possible explanations, the test theory seems to make the most sense, recognizing that none of this really makes sense.
Espionage
Espionage is the act of spying to obtain information—typically sensitive and strategic information held by competitors or adversaries. Given that the videos were recorded on US assets and accessed via a US database, one version of the espionage theory has the US in the role of spy. This raises the question of who and what the US would be spying on and potentially trying to steal or interfere with. For this espionage theory to make sense, the spheres would have to be foreign—presumably Chinese—technology.
While it is certainly possible for China to have advanced beyond us, there are a few problems with that theory. First, if China has advanced to that level, they presumably have surveillance capabilities that at least match the US, meaning that they would know the US had eyes on the plane, which should deter them from revealing secrets except in the most dire situations. Second, it is unclear what the Chinese would be gaining if they were already in possession of the technology. It’s possible they were testing the technology, but, again, they would be aware it was being observed. Finally, it is unclear how the US would have sufficient notice to be there to witness a Chinese test. Even if the reported (and disputed) distress signal is real (see below), it came at the time of the event.
Another variation, and perhaps the most likely one, is that the US was trying to prevent US technology or intellectual property from falling into Chinese hands, such as through double agents working for China. This would be an extreme means to do so that would potentially expose the very technology they would be trying to protect. However, the technology and knowledge represented on the plane might have been worth such effort, particularly if it related to superconductivity. See further discussion of this theory in the article, The Possible Role of the Passengers in MH370’s Disappearance.
If sabotage was the goal, there were many other ways to achieve that, including a legitimate plane accident that would destroy the assets on board. Should the US prefer not to destroy the assets, there remained lower-risk avenues to detain people and things. We can also question whether such advanced technology would be the sole domain of the US or in the hands of a ruling group (read: Cabal or Deep State) that transcends nations.
As a footnote, we know the US was watching because we have the video. This does not preclude other countries’ spy satellites from having video evidence as well. We just don’t seem to have it if it exists.
Rescue
To make sense, the rescue scenario requires a genuine emergency event and someone or something on board so valuable that it outweighed the risk of such an operation. It is not clear that these conditions were met.
Though incomplete and inconclusive, the evidence from the official report does not support a true emergency. Given that the plane met all safety checks, the most likely cause of an accident is a cargo fire, such as from the lithium-ion batteries on board. However, tests by the investigating team could not reproduce conditions in the cargo hold that would start a fire. This is not to say a fire couldn’t have started from the batteries, something hidden in the batteries, a leak in the oxygen system, passenger action, or some undiscovered manufacturing defect, but there is no evidence in the report that it did, so there isn’t much to go on. (Read the deep dive on the cargo here.)
However, Ashton believes there is sufficient evidence of a fire and an attempted emergency water landing in the Nicobar Islands. This is potentially supported by information from a fellow investigator and former pilot that a distress call was picked up at 18:43 UTC by a US Navy listening station at U-Tapao military base in Thailand stating that the cabin faced disintegration. Allegedly, the US provided this signal to Malaysia. It does not appear in the official report and it did not trigger emergency or search and rescue procedures. If reported, it seems to have been ignored, which is suspicious.
The report of the signal came from a March 8, 2014 article in the China Times, originally written in Chinese. It is hard to know whether that signal was legitimate and why such a significant piece of information would be ignored and suppressed. We can speculate that the US service member relaying the distress signal was following protocols and unaware of possible secret US intervention. If so, the distress signal may have been scrubbed from the official record to avoid contradicting the official narrative. However, again, if Malaysia had received the distress call, it is unclear why they would not have acted upon it, unless they were somehow complicit in the cover-up.
Even if we accept that there was a real emergency, it is uncertain who or what was on board that justified the extraordinary rescue attempt, particularly when other rescue options may have been available earlier in the flight and at the moment of disappearance. If the Freescale employees held valuable knowledge and experience, it isn’t clear that these people were so crucial to understanding the technology that it would justify rescuing and essentially kidnapping them and, again, potentially exposing secret technology. Further, if they were so valuable, the company likely would not put all of its most prized assets on one flight (unless they were somehow guarding something or integral to the operation).
Test or Operation
Given that there was an opportunity created to hide the events of MH370, that the US had assets in place to film the event, and there were 20 employees of a technology company suspected to be working on superconductivity (per Ashton), what happened could have been planned as an experiment or test of teleportation technology. Where there is the appearance of coincidences, there can be intent.
As noted above, it is possible that the Freescale employees were a part of an operational test, most likely as observers to oversee and record the event. For this to be true, there must have been significant confidence in the technology to risk the intellectual capital on board. That suggests previous successful attempts. Thus, a variation on this theory is that it wasn’t a test, per se, but a planned operation for an objective other than testing. It isn’t clear what that would be, as it apparently involved civilians and other options were available if the goal was to get the scientists to a secret US location, particularly if those employees on board were volunteers.
A further line of inquiry is what R&D Freescale was conducting at the time. It would also be useful to know who the employees were, what their job responsibilities were, where their trip originated, where they were going, and why they all flew together. And of course, where are they now?
The batteries that may be blamed for an accidental fire and resulting emergency could be part of the technology being tested. Was there something about the batteries, what could have been hidden within them (they weren’t screened by x-ray or subject to detailed inspection), or other electronic cargo that would help create enabling conditions for teleportation. Could that orange glow reported by Kate Tee have been part of the technology in use?
Of course, there are still many unanswered questions tied to this theory. Perhaps most obviously, why test an experimental technology using a civilian plane full of people with families and friends who will miss them?
Alien Intervention
It is possible that the technology shown on the video is not reverse-engineered by humans but actually under the control of non-human intelligence. That would have occurred either by a human’s request or by their own initiative. For it to be in response to a human request, we would need to understand who has the relationships and clout to make such demands and what would motivate other beings to comply. Given all potential events, past and present, that could benefit from alien intervention, it is not clear why MH370 would meet the mark when so many others haven’t. Similarly, it is not clear why NHI would voluntarily intervene for MH370. For those interested in disclosure, the spheres do not need to be piloted by NHI to reveal a massive cover-up of galactic presence.
Startling Implications
A plane goes missing in the most fantastical way at a time when apparently no one except for US satellites and a US drone are watching. We are fed a story that the plane flew on autopilot to its demise in the South Indian Ocean. Despite our satellite, seismic, and underwater monitoring capabilities, as well as an exhaustive multi-year search for the wreckage, no conclusive proof of a crash is presented. Several pieces of debris wash up years later that they say belong to the missing flight but that is not the same as finding the plane. Debris can be planted, it can be faked, or it can be the product of some disintegration during a teleportation event. Debris is not definitive proof of a plane crash.
Regardless of what theory is right on why this happened, the implication is that this is a massive cover-up of epic proportions.
It exposes the extent of surveillance capabilities at a global scale, meaning nothing is really hidden. It demonstrates the willingness and capacity of a small group of smart and savvy people to pull off an incredible deception, hiding and manipulating the truth. It reveals the existence of world-changing technology with far-reaching applications that has been kept secret for private use.
Not least of all, it suggests the direct or indirect assistance of non-human intelligences who possess highly advanced technologies. It begs the questions: where and who did this technology come from? By what means did we acquire it? Who has access to it? How is it being used? Have we already achieved free energy and interplanetary travel? What other technologies are world governments holding in secret? Can we trust anything the government says?
MH370 represents revelation at an unfathomable scale. In finding the truth of MH370, we potentially uncover the lies that have ruled our world and ignite the promise of a better future.
Carolyn Brouillard is a strategist, coach, and writer interested in preparing humanity for the galactic age. Follow her on X.
If you have liked what you see here, please consider sharing it, subscribing, and/or making a donation via Venmo, CashApp, or ko-fi to help me continue to provide this service for free. Thank you!!!
I like the theory of teleportation or black hole technology. Originally before reading this article, my personal conclusion upon seeing those 3 “craft” surround the airplane like that, was the idea that they were using some sort of cloaking technology to make the plane appear to have disappeared. Perhaps the zap was some sort of energy field activating. After which they could have either guided the plane to plane where they needed it to, either by somehow forcing the cooperation of the pilots or most likely by use of more technology like the famed tractor beams depreciated in Star Trek.
Great write up and analysis of possibilities! I believe and suspect the fallout from this will instigate a major confrontation.