". . . concepts seem to exist in consciousness as unique energetic signatures, existing everywhere, all at once."
Very interesting! I sometimes say that math and music occupy the same space in my brain. They feel mutually resonant to me. Of course, I have no idea if that is true. I'm not a neurologist and have never tried to have that idea measured. Perhaps math and music occupy the same space in consciousness.
There is a fascinating guy named Jimmy Blanchett who has made some amazing discoveries that suggest all of our reality is essentially mathematic and based on certain ratios. It makes sense, if you consider the premise that consciousness is fractal and always self-optimizing. I just don't have much of a math mind to go very deep down that line of inquiry.
Aren't it all better viewed as the interface to the shared media, which expands beyond what most humans perceive now as space-time with various names (quantum being current buzz world)? Systems receive/emits signals into it, but they need to develop input/output interfaces, both hardware and software (cognitive, language, sensory-perceptional, noise-filtering) as well as internal and externally synced world models for coherency, border definition and interaction.
Hello and thanks for your thoughts! I'll admit I'm not sure I fully understand. At the end of the day, I believe we are the consciousness of which all information originates. We are not a spider on the web but the web itself. So when I talk of accessing it, it is primarily in removing the filters that hide from view what we already are and all that is available to us. I would liken the filters to your interface concept. Let me know if I mis-interpreted your comment.
Apologies if my earlier thoughts weren’t articulated clearly—they were an outsider’s perspective reflecting on a concept that resonated with me.
The process of "removing filters" to parse background noise into meaningful signals, alongside development of the interfaces mentioned in my reflective comment, strikes me as part of the same journey: refining internal models of understanding.
This also highlights a profound challenge: even between biologically similar consciousnesses (like humans), exchanging meaning via the internet—a medium connecting interfaces that originate in very close temporal and spatial proximity—remains fraught with difficulty.
This struggle feels deeply relevant to your Substack’s focus on the "Getting ready for the Galactic Age," underscoring the irony: our tools for connection act as limiting filters against the very boundaries we aim to transcend.
Thank you for elaborating. We're all trying to make sense of something that often slips through our fingers :) Your point is well-taken. I recently had a conversation with someone and thought I was being very clear but he didn't/couldn't really hear and understand what I was saying because it didn't fit within his pre-existing framing. His filter and bias was so strongly intact that all meaning was processed through it and my meaning was lost on him. Difficult indeed.
In a more playful case, I was talking about communicating with NHI and that day something I had laid out carefully on my bed before getting in the shower disappeared. It reappeared later on the other side of my house. Given a lack of rational explanations, I wondered if that was a communication, as if to say, "we are here" and an invitation to look at perhaps the more subtle ways they are communicating all the time. However, that is my meaning. We are still dancing with symbols.
". . . concepts seem to exist in consciousness as unique energetic signatures, existing everywhere, all at once."
Very interesting! I sometimes say that math and music occupy the same space in my brain. They feel mutually resonant to me. Of course, I have no idea if that is true. I'm not a neurologist and have never tried to have that idea measured. Perhaps math and music occupy the same space in consciousness.
There is a fascinating guy named Jimmy Blanchett who has made some amazing discoveries that suggest all of our reality is essentially mathematic and based on certain ratios. It makes sense, if you consider the premise that consciousness is fractal and always self-optimizing. I just don't have much of a math mind to go very deep down that line of inquiry.
Consciousness...
Aren't it all better viewed as the interface to the shared media, which expands beyond what most humans perceive now as space-time with various names (quantum being current buzz world)? Systems receive/emits signals into it, but they need to develop input/output interfaces, both hardware and software (cognitive, language, sensory-perceptional, noise-filtering) as well as internal and externally synced world models for coherency, border definition and interaction.
Hello and thanks for your thoughts! I'll admit I'm not sure I fully understand. At the end of the day, I believe we are the consciousness of which all information originates. We are not a spider on the web but the web itself. So when I talk of accessing it, it is primarily in removing the filters that hide from view what we already are and all that is available to us. I would liken the filters to your interface concept. Let me know if I mis-interpreted your comment.
Apologies if my earlier thoughts weren’t articulated clearly—they were an outsider’s perspective reflecting on a concept that resonated with me.
The process of "removing filters" to parse background noise into meaningful signals, alongside development of the interfaces mentioned in my reflective comment, strikes me as part of the same journey: refining internal models of understanding.
This also highlights a profound challenge: even between biologically similar consciousnesses (like humans), exchanging meaning via the internet—a medium connecting interfaces that originate in very close temporal and spatial proximity—remains fraught with difficulty.
This struggle feels deeply relevant to your Substack’s focus on the "Getting ready for the Galactic Age," underscoring the irony: our tools for connection act as limiting filters against the very boundaries we aim to transcend.
Thank you for elaborating. We're all trying to make sense of something that often slips through our fingers :) Your point is well-taken. I recently had a conversation with someone and thought I was being very clear but he didn't/couldn't really hear and understand what I was saying because it didn't fit within his pre-existing framing. His filter and bias was so strongly intact that all meaning was processed through it and my meaning was lost on him. Difficult indeed.
In a more playful case, I was talking about communicating with NHI and that day something I had laid out carefully on my bed before getting in the shower disappeared. It reappeared later on the other side of my house. Given a lack of rational explanations, I wondered if that was a communication, as if to say, "we are here" and an invitation to look at perhaps the more subtle ways they are communicating all the time. However, that is my meaning. We are still dancing with symbols.