The Technocratic Convergence: Beyond the Illusion of Political Opposition
Is the dismantling of old systems enabling further centralization of control?
This post may offend some of you. If I’ve done my job well, it will challenge many of you like it did me. I am not claiming to be right. It presents what is taking shape for me based on my research and observations and reflects my ongoing willingness to question everything I once believed, so that I might uncover and understand what is truly transpiring in our world.
In my deep wish to see our current systems of control crumble into oblivion, I failed to fully consider the grave and very real possibility that the political, economic, and social dismantling underway is a coordinated restructuring designed to usher in the same AI-driven technocratic and transhumanist future that many, myself included, mistakenly thought Trump was insurance against.
This dismantling has been interpreted in vastly different ways across the political spectrum. Those aligned with President Trump have been sold a narrative of necessary creative destruction as a precursor to a “Golden Age” of American renewal and empire, where power and prosperity return to the people. Meanwhile, Trump's opponents view these same developments as a dangerous slide toward nationalism and authoritarianism, while seeing Democratic leaders as the defenders of democratic institutions and inclusive governance.
Both seem to be missing the bigger picture.
What if both interpretations are managed narratives designed to obscure and accelerate the march toward further centralization of technocratic power and the erosion of privacy, autonomy, and freedom?
Is the demise of the Deep State a smokescreen for what has always been the larger plan—total control over humankind under the guise of a techno-utopia?
It is time to set aside politics, look plainly at the evidence, and decide what we want for our world.
The Strategic Polarization of Public Discourse
It is possible we are all being played.
The intensity of political polarization serves a strategic purpose beyond us fighting one another. By maintaining hyper-focus on personality-driven conflicts and cultural flashpoints, the public remains distracted from recognizing the technological infrastructure and policies being implemented across administrations.
Consider that traditionally left-leaning Democrats have grown more comfortable with certain forms of centralized authority, like digital surveillance, content moderation (i.e. censorship), and “public health” mandates. Progressive criticism of the Trump administration tends to focus on social issues—access to abortion, LGBTQ+ protections, and democratic norms—rather than challenging the expanding surveillance apparatus or questioning the development of technologies that fundamentally alter the relationship between citizens and the state.
Maybe it is the political right and independents, historically resistant to government expansion and centralized control, who represent the biggest obstacle to a technocratic state. How can they be won over?
Perhaps the key to convincing them is a charismatic, populist leader who champions their cultural values and gives them some wins and apparent sanity after what felt like four years of madness. Even conservatives who might ordinarily resist such technological encroachment may accept it when presented as necessary for national security, economic competitiveness, or countering progressive overreach.
With the unwillingness of prominent “alternative” media outlets to criticize Trump, it seems the strategy might be working. Many outlets that were once critical of surveillance state expansion, corporate capture of government, and military-industrial complex influence have gone silent on these issues. Or they tell us to “Trust the Plan” or to see every confounding Trump move as “4D chess.” They are either bought off or buying the grift as well.
The long-term vision of the Trump camp may be different from the globalist Agenda 2030 regime (and may not be) but it doesn’t really matter if they share the same means: a more technologically-managed society that enables greater centralized control.
At its core, technocrats believe that science and technology can cure all societal problems and government should be run by technical experts, not politicians. This is largely based on the belief that data-driven, technical expertise offers more effective solutions to complex social and economic challenges than political processes driven by popular opinion.
The real fight we should be focused on is not WHO gets to be masters but the liberation of humanity from ALL masters.
The Rise of AI and A New Class of ‘Enlightened’ Rulers
The current deconstruction is likely intended to completely undermine faith and confidence in the old systems so that a new one can be implemented. It is “Build Back Better” but for our entire society. In addition to making the case for the destruction of the old system, part of what might be happening now is a chaos-relief cycle used in social engineering. The process includes:
Create sufficient disruption to destabilize existing patterns
Allow disorientation and bewilderment to reach a breaking point
Offer “solutions” that appear to restore order but advance pre-planned agendas
Rely on relief to overcome resistance to these new structures
It is kind of like being on a torture table where the intensity is being turned up and down and different techniques are being tested to see how much we can handle and under what conditions different people will break. After extreme discomfort, enhanced control will feel more comfortable. This is a form of the “Problem-Reaction-Solution” framework popularized by David Icke, where they create the problem, we react, and they implement a solution that would have been challenged prior to the “problem.”
To get clues as to the solutions being teed up, we can look at what Trump is investing in, who he is elevating to power, and how he is furthering existing agendas. What we see is the implementation of a digital, AI backbone that could be used for sweeping surveillance and control, tech billionaires with tremendous power, and convergence around allegiance to Israel.
Project Stargate
Within days of taking office, President Trump announced Project Stargate, a public-private initiative backed by OpenAI, SoftBank, Oracle, and other major tech players, with plans to invest up to $500 billion to “build the physical and virtual infrastructure to power the next generation of AI.” The four-year plan includes building approximately 20 hyperscale data centers, of which 10 are already being built, and ramping up semiconductor production, aiming to position the U.S. as the global leader in AI.
Trump’s Executive Order 14179, issued shortly after the announcement, framed AI development as a geopolitical and national security imperative, calling for rapid innovation and reduced regulatory burden in order to win the global AI race, particularly against China. This move included rescinding Executive Order 14110, a 2023 directive from the Biden administration that both accelerated AI adoption across federal agencies and established safety protocols, civil rights safeguards, and oversight mechanisms for federal use of AI.
However, lest one think that the Biden Administration was anti-surveillance, civil rights groups saw the potential for abuse in the Biden Executive Order and a following October 2024 memo, claiming it could let security agencies advance a surveillance state.
While the desire to secure technological leadership is reasonable and bipartisan, the deeper concern lies in how AI will be used and who controls it.
The same companies central to Stargate are also deeply involved in biometric identification systems, predictive surveillance, and human-AI interface research—technologies that could be used for widespread social control.
These developments, along with even scarier ones happening within DARPA, raise the specter of AI being used to automate policing, monitor citizen behavior, score individuals for access to services, shape public perception through algorithmic control of information (which we already know is happening), and even directly control thoughts and behaviors. Policies framed as tools for national security or immigration enforcement, such as digital ID systems, may quietly lay the groundwork for comprehensive, real-time population tracking.
During the press conference for Stargate, the CEO of SoftBank, Masayoshi Son, repeatedly called it the beginning of the “golden age.” He predicted the arrival of artificial general intelligence (AGI)—AI systems with the ability to understand, learn, and perform the full range of complex cognitive tasks at a level equal to, or beyond that of human beings “very, very soon.” According to him, that is a stepping stone to the real goal of artificial superintelligence (ASI), which surpasses human intelligence and would be capable of outperforming the best human minds in every field.
While clearly AI can, is, and will benefit humanity in many ways, the potential for it to be used to completely undermine autonomy and freedom is an existential threat.
The Musk Factor
Elon Musk’s elevation to a formal advisory role in the Trump administration, particularly as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), could mark a pivotal moment in the fusion of state and corporate power. Long seen as a visionary disruptor, Musk also represents a deeper paradox—he critiques centralized control while actively building the infrastructure that enables it. Consider…
While warning about AI risks, he has launched xAI, a company focused on building artificial general intelligence, and was instrumental in the founding of OpenAI.
While denouncing government overreach, he has secured tens of billions in federal contracts and subsidies for his ventures in aerospace, energy, transportation, and broadband.
While championing free speech, he exercises significant influence over X with shifting and opaque moderation policies, and likely harvesting of the platform’s user data.
And while presenting as anti-establishment, his companies span nearly every strategic domain relevant to the architecture of a technological control system:
Starlink enables global, space-based surveillance and communications
Tesla produces vehicles equipped with advanced sensors and tracking capabilities
X offers real-time behavioral data and social influence levers
Neuralink aims to link the human brain directly to machines
xAI positions itself at the cutting edge of AI
Musk’s appointment to DOGE is framed as an effort to streamline bureaucracy and eliminate waste, but it could also serve as a Trojan horse for the rapid deployment of AI and automation within government itself, embedding his companies’ tools and logic into its operational core. His ethos of “efficiency” often translates into aggressive workforce reduction, the replacement of human decision-making with algorithmic systems, and an overriding belief that technology offers the best solutions to complex societal problems.
Theories that he has gone rogue or otherwise broken with the entrenched power systems are contradicted by the things he is actually doing and even the familial legacy he is a part of (e.g. Musk's maternal grandfather, Joshua Haldeman led the Technocracy Incorporated organization in Canada).
The Thiel Network
While Musk captures headlines, Peter Thiel also exerts significant influence through a sophisticated network of protégés and allies throughout Trump’s administration, where they can reshape government according to technocratic principles.
Peter Thiel is a co-founder of PayPal and the surveillance firm Palantir Technologies, which works extensively with governments, military and intelligence agencies, law enforcement, and corporations. For example, Palantir’s software provides tools that allow real-time tracking, facial recognition, social network analysis, and geolocation.
Though holding no formal position, Thiel’s network permeates the administration through strategic appointments:
Vice President J.D. Vance, whose political rise was fueled by Thiel’s $15 million campaign contribution;
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick shares investment connections with Thiel;
Jim O’Neill (Deputy HHS secretary) previously worked at Thiel’s funds and foundation;
Ken Howery (Denmark ambassador) co-founded PayPal and Founders Fund with Thiel;
Jacob Helberg (Undersecretary of state) serves as a Palantir adviser;
Michael Kratsios (White House science adviser) worked at Thiel-controlled funds; and
David Sacks (Trump’s “AI and Crypto Czar”) served as the COO of PayPal while Thiel was CEO.
This network extends beyond government into the broader tech world. Thiel and Musk’s relationship spans decades since their PayPal days, with Thiel investing in ventures like Neuralink and both co-founding “America PAC” to support Trump’s return. Their alliance represents the immense power of the “PayPal Mafia” – early PayPal leaders who went on to build Silicon Valley’s most influential companies. Thiel also sits on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group, whose private, off-the-record meetings bring together heads of state, CEOs of multinational corporations, central bankers, and military leaders to discuss global issues, including AI.
As researched by Derrick Broze, the philosophical foundation for this technocratic vision comes partly from Curtis Yarvin (pen name Mencius Moldbug), whose ideas have shaped the thinking of Thiel, Vance, and Trump advisor Marc Andreessen. Yarvin brings together the ideas of earlier philosophers like Thomas Carlyle, Machiavelli, and James Burnham to suggest that the masses are not capable of organizing and governing themselves, making a small ruling “elite” fundamental and inevitable for a functioning society.
However, while both Burnham and Yarvin recognize the dangers of centralized power, especially “‘democratic totalitarianism’” whereby leftists and liberals in the name of democracy cede more and more power to a centralized government,” they significantly diverge on solutions.
Burnham’s Machiavellian framework concludes that distributed power among competing forces protects liberty: “Only power restrains power,” with that counterbalance coming from public opposition and competing institutions.
Yarvin, who is feeding ideas into the Trump circle, instead advocates for a CEO-like figure who would bypass flawed democratic institutions and the “deep state” bureaucracy of unelected civil servants by consolidating power in the “right hands.”
The result is what Broze has called the rise of the “counter-elite.” The vision is of a techno-utopia ruled by an “enlightened” few who, aided by algorithms, govern the country like corporate executives.
Are we to accept these tech billionaires, or broligarchs as Naomi Wolf called them, as the architects and masters of the future?
What really makes them fit to lead?
The Israel Connection
A significant pattern among Trump’s appointees and tech allies is their strong support for Israel. While there are legitimate strategic and geopolitical reasons for an Israeli alliance, the level of importance of Israeli interests raises questions about whether Trump’s team truly represents opposition to established power structures or simply a different configuration of them. What complicates this analysis is distinguishing between Israel as a geopolitical entity, Jewish individuals in positions of influence, and broader hidden power structures that transcend any single identity group.
The AI technocrats surrounding Trump are emphatically pro-Israel. Thiel’s Palantir has formalized a strategic partnership with Israel’s Defense Ministry to supply technology for “war-related missions.” In a letter to its shareholders, Palantir proclaimed, “We are one of a few companies in the world to stand up and announce our support for Israel, which remains steadfast.” Similarly, SoftBank, a Stargate partner, established an Israeli office led by former Mossad chief Yossi Cohen to oversee its substantial Israeli investments.
Within AI leadership, Jewish identity and Israeli connections are prominent. The Jerusalem Post recognized OpenAI CEO Sam Altman as its “#1 Most Influential Jew,” while OpenAI’s co-founder Ilya Sutskever is also Jewish. Following their 2023 visit to Israel, Altman expressed his belief that Israel would play a “huge role” in AI development, coinciding with significant AI investment flowing into the country.
Trump’s cabinet and donor base further reflect these alignments. Miriam Adelson, who contributed $100 million to Trump’s 2024 campaign, maintains what The Jerusalem Post describes as a “close relationship” with President Trump and has “extraordinary influence over US-Israel relations.” The Adelson family was instrumental in shaping Trump’s first-term policies regarding Israel, including the recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, and relocating the US Embassy to Jerusalem.
Other pro-Israel policies include lifting sanctions on Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank and releasing a hold on sending 2,000 lb bombs to Israel.
These loyalties may be behind his proposal to resettle Palestinians and redevelop the territory under US oversight. Under this plan, Gaza’s approximately 2 million residents would be (forcibly?) relocated to neighboring countries, including Egypt and Jordan, and possibly to African nations. The US would assume control of Gaza, undertaking extensive reconstruction efforts in what is now total devastation. Though not publicized as such, with the AI convergence, it could become the world’s foremost “smart city.”
It might also be part of the plan for Greater Israel and the fulfillment of biblical prophecies. According to traditional Jewish interpretations, the messianic prophecies center on God’s promise to Abraham and his descendants of the land “from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates” (Genesis 15:18), supposedly establishing a divine claim to this territory.
For these prophecies to be fulfilled, several key events must occur. First, Jews from around the world must return to Israel in what’s called the “ingathering of exiles” (Isaiah 11:12). A perfect red heifer must be found and sacrificed for the ashes needed in ritual purification ceremonies (Numbers 19). The Third Temple must be rebuilt on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, where the Dome of the Rock currently stands, followed by the restoration of Temple worship including sacrificial rituals. Finally, the Messiah (or Moshiach)—a human descendant of King David—will arrive to rule as king over a new, peaceful, spiritually-elevated world.
For some Christians, the rebuilding of the Jewish temple is also a precursor to the second coming of Christ, which is why evangelical Christians strongly support Israel’s expansion.
Thus, Zionists of Jewish and Christian faiths tend to view modern Israel’s expansion and control over biblical lands as preparing the way for these prophecies’ fulfillment, creating a shared destiny, even if for different messianic outcomes.
Though it sounds absurd to most people, these beliefs are deeply held by many people worldwide and specifically within President Trump’s inner circle, like evangelical Christian Mike Huckabee, Ambassador to Israel; Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Defense; and Pastor Paula White, Head of the White House Faith Office, whose first sit down was with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about this biblical prophecy. It is possible that Trump truly believes the path to a more peaceful, prosperous, and enlightened world is through the fulfillment of these prophecies. Though genociding innocent Palestinian men, women, and children is a curious way to supposedly rid the world of evil. Those who seek peace seem to be the very ones starting wars.
Belief in these prophecies and Jews as a “chosen people” may help explain the support for Israel over decades and across political lines. It might also be a contributing factor to why legitimate criticism of Israeli policies and actions or factual observations of Jewish influence is increasingly considered to be antisemitic. For example, Trump’s recent Executive Order 14188 takes additional steps against those perceived as opposing Israel, particularly on college campuses.
Despite relentless criticism from most legacy media outlets, many of which are Jewish-owned or operated, Trump’s policies and key cabinet picks advance goals aligned with Zionist interests, providing continuity with longstanding foreign policy priorities despite revolutionary rhetoric.
What are we to make of this?
Global Development of Digital Control Systems
This technological transformation transcends national boundaries and traditional geopolitical divisions. While nations appear to compete for technological dominance, the evidence suggests they’re converging toward similar systems of digital control, merely implemented through different cultural and political frameworks.
China’s Social Credit System represents the most fully realized model of digital surveillance and behavior control. Western media often portrays this system as alien to democratic values, yet Western nations are developing remarkably similar capabilities through different implementation paths. In the U.S., private credit scores already determine access to housing and employment, while data brokers compile comprehensive behavioral profiles sold to corporations and government agencies. The EU’s digital identity framework, though framed around convenience and security, creates similar capabilities for centralized monitoring.
The technical architecture for global surveillance grows more sophisticated across countries:
Russia’s Sovereign Internet Law and Digital Ruble establish infrastructure for financial tracking and content monitoring, with similarities to Western digital currency proposals.
India’s Aadhaar biometric ID system—the world’s largest—has transformed from a voluntary program to an essential requirement for accessing government services, banking, and telecommunications.
Israel’s Unit 8200, often compared to the NSA, has incubated numerous surveillance technology companies that service governments worldwide, creating a bridge of technological transfer between nations that publicly oppose each other.
Private tech companies increasingly serve as vectors for this convergence. NSO Group’s Pegasus spyware, developed in Israel, has been sold to governments across the ideological spectrum—from Saudi Arabia to Mexico, Hungary to India. Similarly, facial recognition technologies developed by companies like Clearview AI collect billions of images from social media platforms globally, creating databases used by law enforcement agencies across numerous countries.
This outsourced surveillance shows how tools previously relegated to the state are being democratized and privatized, allowing for distributed enforcement under the guise of security. As seen with AI-driven facial recognition being used by private citizens to identify and report Free Palestine protestors at rallies, the surveillance apparatus increasingly operates through public-private partnerships and citizen participation.
The UN’s Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development provides a revealing framework for understanding this convergence. While its stated goals focus on poverty elimination and environmental sustainability, implementation necessarily involves sophisticated digital infrastructure, standardized identification systems, and integrated global monitoring. The World Economic Forum’s vision of stakeholder capitalism similarly endorses technological solutions that enable unprecedented monitoring capabilities.
Even international tensions and conflicts serve a purpose in this convergence. The perception of competition drives technological development and justifies expanded surveillance in the name of national security. Meanwhile, the same surveillance technologies and control systems proliferate across supposed enemy lines. China and the U.S. may compete vigorously for AI dominance, but both are building remarkably similar infrastructures.
The competition isn’t about whether to build these systems, but who will control them.
Who Really Runs the World?
Putting this all together, we may be witnessing not a simple struggle between opposing political ideologies, but rather a sophisticated realignment of power centers scrambling to control advanced technology, particularly AI, as the future of global dominance. The evidence suggests a shift within existing power structures, with three scenarios worth examining:
(1) Technocratic Counter-Elites Creating ‘Techno-Utopia’: Trump appears to favor tech-oriented “populist” billionaires over traditional institutional elites. This isn’t merely positioning for American leadership (or possibly expansion of the American empire) but reshaping how power operates globally. The Musk-Thiel network, with its unprecedented integration of space-based communications (Starlink), transportation systems (Tesla), social media influence (X), neural interfaces (Neuralink), and AI development (xAI/OpenAI connections), represents a comprehensive technological infrastructure that could be used both to benefit and control the population.
(2) Strategic Restructuring of Old Order: The systematic dismantling of bureaucratic structures may not be resistance to the highest powers but rather the necessary chaos and destruction phase before implementing a new system of control. The evidence doesn’t support simple “controlled opposition,” where Trump is willingly or unwittingly acting on behalf of entrenched powers, but suggests a more complex dynamic where Trump serves as a transitional figure—someone who can win over traditionally liberty-oriented conservatives to accept unprecedented technological monitoring in the name of security, efficiency, and cultural restoration. The social control mechanisms piloted in China may be exported and adapted here for American consumption.
(3) The Outsider Theory: It is also possible that Trump genuinely is trying to take down not just the bureaucratic Deep State but the most hidden hands of global power. While popular among his supporters and consistent with actions like withdrawing from global accords and prohibiting central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), the evidence for Trump as a true outsider is undermined by his administration’s embrace of the technological control infrastructure, his empowerment of surveillance-oriented tech billionaires, and the continuity in key areas like biometric tracking, mRNA technology development, and strong alignment with Israeli interests.
Of these three interpretations, the evidence most strongly supports a complicated interplay between the first two scenarios. The observable dismantling of bureaucratic structures aligns with both the counter-elite thesis and the strategic restructuring hypothesis.
The important question about the dismantling is: to what end?
Indicators
It is possible that Trump and his circle are acting in what they believe is our best interest, though I understand that is a matter of perspective and subject to debate. From my perspective, it is a good thing to expose the corruption and malice of the current systems. Disclosure of the true nature of events central to our country’s history and character—9/11, JFK and MLK assassinations, Epstein’s blackmail operations, and extraterrestrial visitation, among others—is necessary to confront so we can truly understand how the old powers have operated, what they have done, and what we won’t tolerate going forward.
What is actually disclosed and how it is framed will tell us a lot about where old power and influence still lingers, especially when it comes to ET disclosure.
It is also good to pull back from the anti-human, depopulation agenda that is literally destroying our health. While not a perfect record, it appears efforts are underway to clean up the food supply and tackle at least some of the many impediments to better health. While (oddly) controversial, the Trump Administration’s efforts to protect children from sterilization, early and over-sexualization and abuse that inhabits healthy attachment patterns, and over-exposure to technology that interferes with healthy human development are evidence of a more pro-human orientation.
We can look at how the integrity of life is or is not being honored and protected to inform true motivations and identify genuine breaks from the transhumanist agenda.
We may be witnessing a struggle between competing elite factions with different visions of how technology should be implemented and who should benefit, with all factions recognizing the critical role of AI. A top indicator of the path we are on is whether individual freedom is being expanded or contracted. As AI rolls out, is it being directed at uses that improve life and liberty for humans or subject us to greater state control? As it is commonly said, AI is neutral—it is how it is used and for what ends that determines its impact. We should be alert to window-dressing that highlights things like helping cure cancer or disability while obscuring transhumanist things like real-time biometric surveillance and signaling and putting brain chips in babies.
Who benefits from these systems? Who controls the data? What meaningful checks exist on this power? What is the state of personal privacy? And are our bodies more or less free of government interference and forced technological intervention?
Finally, to understand where the real power lies, we have to follow the money. By now everyone should know that a handful of companies like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street control all the planet’s wealth, managing over $20 trillion and holding significant positions in virtually every major corporation. These firms’ increasing investment in AI, data analytics, and surveillance technologies creates a feedback loop between financial and technological power.
There is evidence that recent Trump actions to restructure global trade signal a potential departure from international economic frameworks and a focus on national economic sovereignty. He also signed an executive order developing a federal regulatory framework for digital assets and prohibiting the establishment, issuance, or promotion of CBDCs.
Where the money flows under these reforms will help reveal shifts in real economic power. Who is getting richer? Who is getting poorer?
I am still struggling to reconcile the role of Israel beyond what seems to be explained by geopolitical strategy. The concentration of individuals with connections to Israel in positions of influence across media, finance, law, and technology raises legitimate questions about aligned interests and coordinated action. The challenge lies in distinguishing between correlation and causation, individual actions and coordinated efforts.
The Jewish representation could be explained by cultural emphasis on higher education, loyalty to trusted networks, intergenerational wealth, and privileged access based on background, school, or culture—which characterizes the nature of power generally and is not unique to the Jewish faith.
However, the possibility remains that a small number of Jewish individuals and families, like the Rothschild lineage, have concentrated power and seek to rule over the world. They may be part of a broader group united more by the shared goal of world control and generations of coordination than demographics. They may be the founders and/or leaders of it. This is often dismissed as conspiracy but more extreme sects of Judaism openly speak of Jewish supremacy and world control—we just aren’t allowed to talk about it. This topic warrants examination without dismissing it as mere coincidence or conspiracy.
While the ultimate origins and levers of power are an open question for me, it almost doesn’t matter.
The true battle isn’t between Democrat and Republican, progressive and conservative values, or religious and secular beliefs, but between centralized control and human autonomy, privacy, and freedom.
That is the hard line—do you support the concentration of power or the liberation of the human race?
The Golden Age
The critical question is not whether the current system is being dismantled—it clearly is—but what will replace it. If my analysis is correct, then the passionate debates between Trump supporters and opponents represent a form of collective misdirection—keeping attention focused on personality and partisan identity while the more fundamental transformation into an AI-driven technocratic state advances largely unexamined.
The speed of AI development means the window for meaningful public input may be narrowing. The major intervention point is not in resisting the dismantling or the rise of AI but in actively shaping what comes next. The technological infrastructure being developed could enable greater human freedom and flourishing or unprecedented control—and the determining factor will be who directs these systems and toward what ends.
Instead of buying into the billionaires’ vision of a “golden age,” we need to claim our agency to decide what we want for our world.
Interrupting this vision requires maintaining clarity during periods of manufactured chaos, recognizing the patterns of manipulation, and insisting on genuinely decentralized alternatives to the technological control systems being prepared. We must continuously ask:
Do these systems enhance or diminish human freedom?
Do they concentrate or distribute power?
Do they render our biological existence more or less subject to external control?
For those of us seeking genuine decentralized alternatives, the challenge becomes recognizing when apparent opposition masks underlying convergence and staying truly independent of political identity and quieting the ego’s resistance to admitting where we have been wrong or misled.
Our strongest allegiance should be to the truth and the better world we want for our human kin.
The path to a more peaceful, loving, and equitable world is not made possible through AI. It flows through the more fundamental technology that we all possess—consciousness itself. Consciousness, as the awareness and embodiment of who and what we truly are as eternal, divine, and limitless, is what will create solutions to society’s ills and usher in a real golden age. Which is why so much effort has been invested in hiding it from us—be it brain chips, toxins, or misplaced hopes of a messiah.
There is no reason to wait for a messiah to return as master or to cede power to any ruling class. The real power already exists within all of us. It is time to claim and exercise it.
Carolyn Brouillard is a passionate explorer of potential and possibility who loves to exchange ideas through writing and speaking. As a transformational coach, she helps change-seekers create a life they love through transforming their thinking and claiming their power. She is also Managing Partner of ExoFuturesConsulting, which works with forward-thinking organizations ready to explore the profound implications of contact with NHI.
Very well researched and written. I have been following similar threads and you have beuatifully woven them together. deep concern.
Smart, so smart. This article is right on top of what needs to be considered as a new era is quickly being ushered in.
One curious thing - why would the new US AI infrastructure program be called 'Stargate'? It's no secret that Stargate was the name of a secret US govt program focused on psychic phenomenon.
That leads me to where I think the true origin of this push for a global power structure may lie
- it ties into ET/NHI, and some sort of great battle going on regarding life on this planet. And the mystery at that core is the relationship between the physical and metaphysical, with consciousness as the bridge.
One other potential threat posed by AI - in addition to the restriction on liberties it may impose with global surveillance and monitoring - is the threat it poses to sovereign thought/consciousness as the populace is increasingly lulled to sleep by entertainment/scrolling/disconnect from real life/atrophy of reasoning power.